Bai cua minh - Cute Panda

It is obvious that the basic reason for the world’s large population work is money. Without money, no one can succeed in life, in relationship and society. Everyone knows that and many companies reward their outstanding employees with cash and bonuses. However is it always the best way to motivate employees all the time? This essay will outline some reasons for and against the idea that money is a good motivator.

Let me first deal with the positive sides of money and cash incentives. For workers and employees, money motivates them to do the job effectively. Extra money stimulates employees to work harder and better. As a result, productivity is boosted considerably. Both employees and companies can benefit from that.

However, there are two sides of the same coin. Money is not always a king. Where there is a motivation, there will be a competition. Money may force employees against each other. Hence, this leads to conflict in office. Conflict can be a source of frustration, even destruction of morale. Besides that, pressure could be also arose. Working under high pressure may lessen efficiency of employees.

Opponents of money incentives also point out that there are still many other ways to reward employees without causing stressful working environment. The employers may think of creative bonuses such as offering their excellent employees flex time or giving them travel ticket, gift certificates for their good performance in a month. In addition, many companies have very good policy for taking care of their employees’ family. This will strongly inspire the loyalty of employees to companies.

In conclusion, setting money as a motivator is both good and bad. On one hand, money is really suitable motivator. On the other hand, it exposes some weakness. Therefore, the manager should consider carefully before applying that.